<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Including PHP Files: One or Many?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://w3prodigy.com/web-production/including-php-file-one-many/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://w3prodigy.com/web-production/including-php-file-one-many/</link>
	<description>Web Production Expert in Saint Petersburg, Florida</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:44:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Fortner</title>
		<link>http://w3prodigy.com/web-production/including-php-file-one-many/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Fortner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 03:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w3prodigy.com/?p=399#comment-211</guid>
		<description>I imagine it would help quite substantially in the case of includes. From my understanding of opcode caching, it would cache a file including multiple files as a single file with the includes, after all the goal of opcode caching is to cache on the compiler level. We&#039;ll be implementing opcode caching in a project I&#039;m working on at a later date, I&#039;ll see what benchmarks I can run and report those results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine it would help quite substantially in the case of includes. From my understanding of opcode caching, it would cache a file including multiple files as a single file with the includes, after all the goal of opcode caching is to cache on the compiler level. We&#8217;ll be implementing opcode caching in a project I&#8217;m working on at a later date, I&#8217;ll see what benchmarks I can run and report those results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://w3prodigy.com/web-production/including-php-file-one-many/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w3prodigy.com/?p=399#comment-210</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be interested to see if the opcode speeds up the includes or not on the following runs.  I&#039;ve never really had a change to test opcode caches in depth to see which parts of PHP they really help out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested to see if the opcode speeds up the includes or not on the following runs.  I&#8217;ve never really had a change to test opcode caches in depth to see which parts of PHP they really help out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Fortner</title>
		<link>http://w3prodigy.com/web-production/including-php-file-one-many/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Fortner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w3prodigy.com/?p=399#comment-209</guid>
		<description>An opcode cache was not used for these tests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An opcode cache was not used for these tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://w3prodigy.com/web-production/including-php-file-one-many/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w3prodigy.com/?p=399#comment-208</guid>
		<description>For this test were you using an opcode cache?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For this test were you using an opcode cache?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

