Active NHL Players Totals by Birth State - Career Stats (2024)

See Also

The 5 Greatest Hockey Players EverDid Wayne Gretzky Retire Too Early?Alex Ovechkin career goal tracker: How close is the Capitals captain to breaking Wayne Gretzky's record | Sporting NewsNHL99: A project ranking the greatest players in modern NHL history

Rk		State	Players	GP	G	A	P	PIM	PPG	SHG	GWG
1		Minnesota	49	16108	2329	4618	6947	6903	505	56	375
2		New York	26	10348	1950	3500	5450	6209	430	22	317
3		Michigan	33	11501	1729	2976	4705	5351	356	61	279
4		Massachusetts	22	8104	1676	2569	4245	3079	341	39	283
5		Wisconsin	10	5178	1023	1788	2811	2178	301	18	158
6		New Jersey	13	3713	733	1196	1929	1508	160	7	123
7		California	11	3044	794	837	1631	775	154	18	124
8		Arizona	7	2193	659	896	1555	1732	157	10	90
9		Washington	4	2483	609	801	1410	1001	147	24	90
10		Florida	8	2756	411	911	1322	1565	89	11	65
11		Texas	7	3002	380	813	1193	1746	54	27	68
12		Missouri	8	2893	479	703	1182	2409	56	16	75
13		Ohio	8	2855	435	729	1164	1371	82	16	68
14		Pennsylvania	5	2199	449	587	1036	819	86	21	71
15		Illinois	11	2698	349	613	962	1183	55	14	53
16		Connecticut	5	2715	443	492	935	659	77	22	72
17		Nebraska	2	896	240	400	640	431	54	1	36
18		Colorado	5	1796	196	436	632	1064	27	7	25
19		Indiana	3	1407	149	359	508	729	56	1	22
20		South Carolina	2	554	115	140	255	539	6	3	24
21		Utah	1	919	93	122	215	207	3	10	21
22		Maine	2	755	55	156	211	291	11	1	6
23		Alabama	1	454	62	70	132	212	2	4	15
24		Rhode Island	2	418	63	43	106	146	1	2	11
25		Oklahoma	1	567	19	82	101	281	2	1	4
26		Montana	1	102	9	37	46	21	4	0	1
27		Mississippi	1	132	9	18	27	184	1	0	1
28		Oregon	1	114	7	16	23	39	2	0	0
29		Virginia	2	77	7	15	22	8	1	0	1
30		New Hampshire	2	174	5	14	19	14	3	0	2
31		South Dakota	1	43	8	7	15	6	0	0	2
32		Louisiana	1	15	2	3	5	12	0	0	0
33		North Dakota	1	13	0	3	3	2	0	0	0
34		Alaska	2	179	0	2	2	27	0	0	0
35		Iowa	1	103	0	1	1	2	0	0	0

See Also

Dallas Stars | History & Notable Players

Percentage of Active NHL Players by Birth States ‑CareerStats

Rk		State	Players	GP	G	A	P	PIM	PPG	SHG	GWG
1		Minnesota	18.9%	17.8%	15.0%	17.8%	16.8%	16.2%	15.7%	13.6%	15.1%
2		New York	10.0%	11.4%	12.6%	13.5%	13.2%	14.5%	13.3%	5.3%	12.8%
3		Michigan	12.7%	12.7%	11.2%	11.5%	11.4%	12.5%	11.0%	14.8%	11.2%
4		Massachusetts	8.5%	9.0%	10.8%	9.9%	10.2%	7.2%	10.6%	9.5%	11.4%
5		Wisconsin	3.9%	5.7%	6.6%	6.9%	6.8%	5.1%	9.3%	4.4%	6.4%
6		New Jersey	5.0%	4.1%	4.7%	4.6%	4.7%	3.5%	5.0%	1.7%	5.0%
7		California	4.2%	3.4%	5.1%	3.2%	3.9%	1.8%	4.8%	4.4%	5.0%
8		Arizona	2.7%	2.4%	4.3%	3.5%	3.8%	4.1%	4.9%	2.4%	3.6%
9		Washington	1.5%	2.7%	3.9%	3.1%	3.4%	2.3%	4.6%	5.8%	3.6%
10		Florida	3.1%	3.0%	2.7%	3.5%	3.2%	3.7%	2.8%	2.7%	2.6%
11		Texas	2.7%	3.3%	2.5%	3.1%	2.9%	4.1%	1.7%	6.6%	2.7%
12		Missouri	3.1%	3.2%	3.1%	2.7%	2.9%	5.6%	1.7%	3.9%	3.0%
13		Ohio	3.1%	3.2%	2.8%	2.8%	2.8%	3.2%	2.5%	3.9%	2.7%
14		Pennsylvania	1.9%	2.4%	2.9%	2.3%	2.5%	1.9%	2.7%	5.1%	2.9%
15		Illinois	4.2%	3.0%	2.3%	2.4%	2.3%	2.8%	1.7%	3.4%	2.1%
16		Connecticut	1.9%	3.0%	2.9%	1.9%	2.3%	1.5%	2.4%	5.3%	2.9%
17		Nebraska	0.8%	1.0%	1.5%	1.5%	1.5%	1.0%	1.7%	0.2%	1.5%
18		Colorado	1.9%	2.0%	1.3%	1.7%	1.5%	2.5%	0.8%	1.7%	1.0%
19		Indiana	1.2%	1.6%	1.0%	1.4%	1.2%	1.7%	1.7%	0.2%	0.9%
20		South Carolina	0.8%	0.6%	0.7%	0.5%	0.6%	1.3%	0.2%	0.7%	1.0%
21		Utah	0.4%	1.0%	0.6%	0.5%	0.5%	0.5%	0.1%	2.4%	0.8%
22		Maine	0.8%	0.8%	0.4%	0.6%	0.5%	0.7%	0.3%	0.2%	0.2%
23		Alabama	0.4%	0.5%	0.4%	0.3%	0.3%	0.5%	0.1%	1.0%	0.6%
24		Rhode Island	0.8%	0.5%	0.4%	0.2%	0.3%	0.3%	0.0%	0.5%	0.4%
25		Oklahoma	0.4%	0.6%	0.1%	0.3%	0.2%	0.7%	0.1%	0.2%	0.2%
26		Montana	0.4%	0.1%	0.1%	0.1%	0.1%	0.0%	0.1%	0.0%	0.0%
27		Mississippi	0.4%	0.1%	0.1%	0.1%	0.1%	0.4%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
28		Oregon	0.4%	0.1%	0.0%	0.1%	0.1%	0.1%	0.1%	0.0%	0.0%
29		Virginia	0.8%	0.1%	0.0%	0.1%	0.1%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
30		New Hampshire	0.8%	0.2%	0.0%	0.1%	0.0%	0.0%	0.1%	0.0%	0.1%
31		South Dakota	0.4%	0.0%	0.1%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.1%
32		Louisiana	0.4%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
33		North Dakota	0.4%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
34		Alaska	0.8%	0.2%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.1%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
35		Iowa	0.4%	0.1%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%

Current season NHL stats last updated: December 17, 2023
Current season NHL stats provided by XML Team Solutions: Content Copyright 2023, The Sports Forecaster. Distributed by XML Team Solutions.

As a seasoned hockey analyst with a deep understanding of the sport and its intricate details, I've closely followed the trends and statistics that shape the world of professional hockey. My extensive knowledge is grounded in a comprehensive grasp of player demographics, team dynamics, and performance metrics. Let's delve into the insights provided by the article on NHL players' birth states and their career statistics.

Analysis of NHL Players by Birth State:

1. Minnesota:

• Players: 49
• Notable Stats: Leading in goals, assists, and points per game (GPG, APP, IMPP).
• Observation: Minnesota produces a significant number of high-impact players, with well-rounded contributions.

2. New York:

• Players: 26
• Notable Stats: Consistently strong across all categories, with a notable presence in goals and assists.
• Observation: New York maintains a balanced representation, showcasing versatile players across various positions.

3. Michigan:

• Players: 33
• Notable Stats: Strong in goals and power-play goals (GPG, PPG), indicating offensive prowess.
• Observation: Michigan's players demonstrate a scoring ability, particularly in critical situations like power plays.

4. Massachusetts:

• Players: 22
• Notable Stats: Balanced performance, excelling in goals, assists, and power-play goals.
• Observation: Massachusetts contributes well-rounded players with versatility in offensive and strategic play.

5. Wisconsin:

• Players: 10
• Notable Stats: Relatively lower numbers but notable in goals and points per game.
• Observation: Despite a smaller representation, Wisconsin players make a measurable impact, especially in scoring.

6. New Jersey:

• Players: 13
• Notable Stats: Strong in assists and power-play goals.
• Observation: New Jersey players excel in playmaking and strategic contributions, enhancing team dynamics.

7. California:

• Players: 11
• Notable Stats: Balanced performance, particularly in goals and assists.
• Observation: California contributes players with a diverse skill set, showcasing adaptability.

8. Arizona:

• Players: 7
• Notable Stats: Consistent performance in various categories, with a notable presence in goals.
• Observation: Arizona's players display adaptability and effectiveness in goal-scoring.

9. Washington:

• Players: 4
• Notable Stats: Strong in goals and points per game.
• Observation: Despite a smaller representation, Washington produces impactful players with a scoring focus.

10. Florida:

• Players: 8
• Notable Stats: Balanced performance across categories.
• Observation: Florida contributes players with a well-rounded skill set, showcasing versatility.

Percentage Analysis:

• Minnesota boasts the highest percentage of active NHL players, indicating a strong hockey culture.
• New York and Michigan follow closely, reflecting the continued influence of traditional hockey regions.
• States like California, Arizona, and Florida show significant percentages, signaling the sport's growth in non-traditional hockey areas.

In summary, the distribution of NHL players by birth state reveals not only the traditional powerhouses but also the emergence of hockey talent in non-traditional regions, contributing to the sport's overall diversity and growth.