Americans finally have found their own soft spot for the world’s most beloved professional sport. After what seemed an eternity of low popularity among U.S. fans, soccer — better known as “football” to the international community — has gained admiration and respect here at home.
Much of the credit for the sport’s growing domestic acceptance goes to the U.S. Women’s National Team, who made us proud with its record-breaking victory in the 2015 FIFA Women’s World Cup. Part of the glory is also owed to COPA América Centenario, the world’s oldest soccer competition, held the following year on U.S. turf for the first time in its 100-year history. In 2019, the U.S. National Team won the FIFA Women’s World Cup once more, and last year they took home a bronze medal at the Tokyo Olympics. Most recently, the U.S. Men’s National Team has qualified for the 2022 World Cup.
Some places make it easier for soccer fans to enjoy the sport than others, though. To determine the top spots for soccer fandom, WalletHub compared more than 290 U.S. cities with at least one college or professional soccer team across five divisions and examined each based on 52 key metrics. Our data set ranges from minimum season-ticket price for a game to stadium accessibility to number of championship wins.
In light of the World Cup taking place this year, WalletHub also released its FIFA World Cup By The Numbers Infographic with fun stats about the competition.
Table of Contents
Main FindingsRanking by City SizeAsk the ExpertsMethodology
Main Findings
Embed on your website
Best Soccer Cities in America
Overall Rank | City | Total Score | MLS | NWSL | USL | College Soccer (Men) | College Soccer (Women) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Los Angeles, CA | 56.87 | 1 | 9 | 23 | 20 | 130 |
2 | Seattle, WA | 51.68 | 3 | 3 | 28 | 61 | 159 |
3 | Portland, OR | 50.3 | 9 | 1 | 28 | 143 | 47 |
4 | Orlando, FL | 43.28 | 6 | 4 | 28 | 78 | 119 |
5 | Kansas City, MO | 42.17 | 2 | 13 | 28 | 154 | 201 |
6 | Washington, DC | 41.9 | 7 | 7 | 28 | 34 | 92 |
7 | New York, NY | 41.25 | 8 | 11 | 25 | 4 | 15 |
8 | Atlanta, GA | 40.85 | 4 | 13 | 27 | 47 | 99 |
9 | Salt Lake City, UT | 37.44 | 5 | 13 | 28 | 170 | 156 |
10 | St. Paul, MN | 34.27 | 10 | 13 | 28 | 65 | 122 |
11 | Columbus, OH | 33.7 | 11 | 13 | 28 | 95 | 85 |
12 | Chicago, IL | 33.7 | 22 | 6 | 28 | 38 | 83 |
13 | Boston, MA | 33.24 | 12 | 13 | 28 | 27 | 21 |
14 | Miami, FL | 32.57 | 15 | 13 | 10 | 96 | 222 |
15 | Houston, TX | 32.57 | 18 | 10 | 28 | 89 | 118 |
16 | Philadelphia, PA | 30.96 | 17 | 13 | 28 | 8 | 9 |
17 | Cary, NC | 30.52 | 24 | 2 | 28 | 170 | 288 |
18 | Denver, CO | 30.13 | 13 | 13 | 28 | 134 | 161 |
19 | Dallas, TX | 29.82 | 16 | 13 | 28 | 42 | 60 |
20 | San Jose, CA | 28.97 | 14 | 13 | 28 | 161 | 257 |
21 | Louisville, KY | 28.43 | 24 | 8 | 1 | 126 | 174 |
22 | Cincinnati, OH | 28.04 | 19 | 13 | 28 | 108 | 104 |
23 | Nashville, TN | 26.78 | 21 | 13 | 28 | 86 | 32 |
24 | Austin, TX | 26.53 | 20 | 13 | 28 | 170 | 137 |
25 | Kansas City, KS | 21.17 | 24 | 5 | 28 | 170 | 288 |
26 | Charleston, SC | 18.25 | 24 | 13 | 3 | 133 | 46 |
27 | Hartford, CT | 17.22 | 24 | 13 | 7 | 114 | 86 |
28 | Birmingham, AL | 17.08 | 24 | 13 | 5 | 151 | 87 |
29 | Tulsa, OK | 16.86 | 24 | 13 | 13 | 30 | 97 |
30 | San Diego, CA | 16.83 | 24 | 12 | 26 | 102 | 164 |
Note: With the exception of “Total Score,” all of the columns in the table above depict the relative rank of that city, where a rank of 1 represents the best conditions for that metric category.
MLS Teams' Performance
Best-Performing
- 1. Philadelphia, PA
- 2. Seattle, WA
- 3. Portland, OR
- 4. Kansas City, MO
- 5. New York, NY
Worst-Performing
- 18. Miami, FL
- 19. Austin, TX
- 20. Chicago, IL
- 21. Houston, TX
- 22. Cincinnati, OH
Best City vs. Worst City: 3x Difference
Philadelphia, PA vs. Cincinnati, OH
NWLS Teams' Performance
Best-Performing
- 1. Cary, NC
- 2. Portland, OR
- 3. Chicago, IL
- 4. Seattle, WA
- 5. Houston, TX
Worst-Performing
- 6. Washington, DC
- 7. Orlando, FL
- 8. Louisville, KY
- 9. New York, NY
- 10. Kansas City, KS
Best City vs. Worst City: 5x Difference
Cary, NC vs. Kansas City, KS
Min. Season-Ticket Price for MLS Games
Lowest
- 1. Houston, TX
- 2. Denver, CO
- 3. Dallas, TX
- 4. Chicago, IL
- 5. Salt Lake City, UT
Highest
- 19. Washington, DC
- 20. Austin, TX
- 21. Kansas City, MO
- 22. Atlanta, GA
- 23. Charlotte, NC
Best City vs. Worst City: 3x Difference
Houston, TX vs. Charlotte, NC
Min. Season-Ticket Price for NWSL Games
Lowest
- 1. Chicago, IL
- 2. Cary, NC
- 3. Portland, OR
- 4. Kansas City, KS
- 5. Seattle, WA
Highest
- 8. Louisville, KY
- 9. Los Angeles, CA
- 10. Houston, TX
- 11. Washington, DC
- 12. San Diego, CA
Best City vs. Worst City: 2x Difference
Chicago, IL vs. San Diego, CA
MLS Stadium Capacity
Highest
- 1. Atlanta, GA
- 2. Salt Lake City, UT
- 3. Orlando, FL
- 4. Cincinnati, OH
- 5. Charlotte, NC
Lowest
- 19. Dallas, TX
- 20. Los Angeles, CA
- 21. Philadelphia, PA
- 22. Houston, TX
- 23. New York, NY
Best City vs. Worst City: 23x Difference
Atlanta, GA vs. New York, NY
NWSL Stadium Capacity
Highest
- 1. Kansas City, KS
- 2. Orlando, FL
- 3. Cary, NC
- 4. Portland, OR
- 5. Washington, DC
Lowest
- 8. Seattle, WA
- 9. Houston, TX
- 10. Chicago, IL
- 11. Los Angeles, CA
- 12. New York, NY
Best City vs. Worst City: 41x Difference
Kansas City, KS vs. New York, NY
MLS Fans
Most Engaged
- T-1. Orlando, FL
- T-1. Atlanta, GA
- 3. Salt Lake City, UT
- 4. Seattle, WA
- 5. Kansas City, MO
Least Engaged
- 19. Philadelphia, PA
- 20. Nashville, TN
- 21. Chicago, IL
- 22. Austin, TX
- 23. Charlotte, NC
Best City vs. Worst City: 33x Difference
Orlando, FL vs. Charlotte, NC
NWSL Fans
Most Engaged
- T-1. Orlando, FL
- T-1. Seattle, WA
- T-1. Portland, OR
- 4. Washington, DC
- 5. Los Angeles, CA
Least Engaged
- 4. Washington, DC
- 5. Los Angeles, CA
- 6. Houston, TX
- 7. Chicago, IL
- 8. New York, NY
Best City vs. Worst City: 25x Difference
Orlando, FL vs. New York, NY
Show More
Ranking by City Size
Rank (1=Best) | Large City (Score) | Rank (1=Best) | Midsize City (Score) | Rank (1=Best) | Small City (Score) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Los Angeles, CA (56.87) | 1 | Orlando, FL (43.28) | 1 | Edinburg, TX (15.82) |
2 | Seattle, WA (51.68) | 2 | Salt Lake City, UT (37.44) | 2 | Clemson, SC (12.83) |
3 | Portland, OR (50.30) | 3 | Cary, NC (30.52) | 3 | Leesburg, VA (11.70) |
4 | Kansas City, MO (42.17) | 4 | Kansas City, KS (21.17) | 4 | Buies Creek, NC (11.29) |
5 | Washington, DC (41.90) | 5 | Charleston, SC (18.25) | 5 | Charlottesville, VA (11.12) |
6 | New York, NY (41.25) | 6 | Hartford, CT (17.22) | 6 | Chapel Hill, NC (11.12) |
7 | Atlanta, GA (40.85) | 7 | Birmingham, AL (17.08) | 7 | Seaside, CA (10.58) |
8 | St. Paul, MN (34.27) | 8 | Irvine, CA (16.47) | 8 | State College, PA (10.53) |
9 | Columbus, OH (33.70) | 9 | St. Petersburg, FL (14.05) | 9 | West Long Branch, NJ (10.02) |
10 | Chicago, IL (33.70) | 10 | Providence, RI (8.84) | 10 | Bloomington, IN (9.64) |
11 | Boston, MA (33.24) | 11 | Springfield, MO (8.01) | 11 | Morgantown, WV (9.54) |
12 | Miami, FL (32.57) | 12 | Greensboro, NC (7.77) | 12 | West Point, NY (9.47) |
13 | Houston, TX (32.57) | 13 | Dayton, OH (7.54) | 13 | Highland Heights, KY (9.40) |
14 | Philadelphia, PA (30.96) | 14 | Cambridge, MA (7.24) | 14 | Stanford, CA (9.28) |
15 | Denver, CO (30.13) | 15 | Des Moines, IA (7.01) | 15 | Princeton, NJ (8.85) |
16 | Dallas, TX (29.82) | 16 | Columbia, SC (7.01) | 16 | Boiling Springs, NC (8.84) |
17 | San Jose, CA (28.97) | 17 | Wilmington, NC (6.97) | 17 | Lewisburg, PA (8.84) |
18 | Louisville, KY (28.43) | 18 | South Bend, IN (6.85) | 18 | Kingston, RI (8.76) |
19 | Cincinnati, OH (28.04) | 19 | Buffalo, NY (6.78) | 19 | Radford, VA (8.60) |
20 | Nashville, TN (26.78) | 20 | Lowell, MA (6.49) | 20 | College Park, MD (8.44) |
21 | Austin, TX (26.53) | 21 | Richmond, VA (6.48) | 21 | Hempstead, NY (8.40) |
22 | Tulsa, OK (16.86) | 22 | High Point, NC (6.40) | 22 | Annapolis, MD (8.20) |
23 | San Diego, CA (16.83) | 23 | Fort Wayne, IN (6.21) | 23 | Storrs, CT (8.18) |
24 | Pittsburgh, PA (16.78) | 24 | Santa Clara, CA (6.16) | 24 | Conway, SC (8.11) |
25 | Sacramento, CA (16.09) | 25 | Winston-Salem, NC (6.08) | 25 | Hamilton, NY (8.02) |
26 | Indianapolis, IN (15.20) | 26 | Jersey City, NJ (6.07) | 26 | New Brunswick, NJ (7.91) |
27 | Memphis, TN (14.92) | 27 | Akron, OH (5.80) | 27 | DeKalb, IL (7.72) |
28 | Colorado Springs, CO (14.56) | 28 | Green Bay, WI (5.51) | 28 | Fairfield, CT (7.69) |
29 | Detroit, MI (14.32) | 29 | Spokane, WA (5.31) | 29 | Bowling Green, OH (7.69) |
30 | Las Vegas, NV (14.03) | 30 | Fullerton, CA (5.08) | 30 | Greenville, SC (7.64) |
31 | Charlotte, NC (13.55) | 31 | Norfolk, VA (5.06) | 31 | Hamden, CT (7.60) |
32 | Albuquerque, NM (13.09) | 32 | Durham, NC (4.98) | 32 | Allegany, NY (7.53) |
33 | San Antonio, TX (12.57) | 33 | Ann Arbor, MI (4.73) | 33 | Conway, AR (7.52) |
34 | El Paso, TX (12.33) | 34 | Berkeley, CA (4.64) | 34 | Harrisonburg, VA (7.48) |
35 | Phoenix, AZ (11.93) | 35 | Madison, WI (4.60) | 35 | Lawrence, NJ (7.47) |
36 | St. Louis, MO (8.48) | 36 | Macon-Bibb County, GA (4.59) | 36 | Amherst, MA (7.40) |
37 | Oakland, CA (8.00) | 37 | Knoxville, TN (4.46) | 37 | New Britain, CT (7.38) |
38 | Riverside, CA (7.55) | 38 | Gainesville, FL (4.32) | 38 | Hackensack, NJ (7.32) |
39 | Milwaukee, WI (7.33) | 39 | New Haven, CT (4.21) | 39 | Easton, PA (7.30) |
40 | Baltimore, MD (7.17) | 40 | Abilene, TX (4.18) | 40 | Spartanburg, SC (7.18) |
41 | Raleigh, NC (6.99) | 41 | Greeley, CO (3.85) | 41 | Smithfield, RI (7.17) |
42 | Tampa, FL (6.90) | 42 | Mobile, AL (3.83) | 42 | Farmville, VA (7.13) |
43 | Cleveland, OH (6.50) | 42 | Provo, UT (3.83) | 43 | Bethlehem, PA (7.07) |
44 | Jacksonville, FL (6.50) | 44 | College Station, TX (3.74) | 44 | Newark, DE (6.86) |
45 | Stockton, CA (6.10) | 45 | Chattanooga, TN (3.73) | 45 | Fairfax, VA (6.85) |
46 | Lexington-Fayette, KY (5.53) | 46 | Fargo, ND (3.72) | 46 | Lynchburg, VA (6.84) |
47 | Omaha, NE (4.37) | 47 | Tallahassee, FL (3.70) | 47 | Kalamazoo, MI (6.81) |
48 | Bakersfield, CA (4.06) | 48 | Athens, GA (3.53) | 48 | Durham, NH (6.68) |
49 | Honolulu, HI (3.73) | 49 | Syracuse, NY (3.43) | 49 | Fort Myers, FL (6.64) |
50 | San Francisco, CA (3.67) | 50 | Clarksville, TN (3.32) | 50 | Hanover, NH (6.52) |
51 | Fort Worth, TX (2.71) | 51 | Beaumont, TX (3.24) | 51 | Lewiston, NY (6.41) |
52 | Tucson, AZ (2.67) | 52 | Waco, TX (3.15) | 52 | Williamsburg, VA (6.38) |
53 | Long Beach, CA (2.56) | 53 | Newark, NJ (2.99) | 53 | Binghamton, NY (6.24) |
54 | Minneapolis, MN (2.56) | 54 | Worcester, MA (2.97) | 54 | San Luis Obispo, CA (6.13) |
55 | Fresno, CA (2.02) | 55 | Lincoln, NE (2.96) | 55 | Loretto, PA (6.10) |
56 | Corpus Christi, TX (1.55) | 56 | Lubbock, TX (2.96) | 56 | Stony Brook, NY (5.97) |
57 | Denton, TX (2.88) | 57 | Davidson, NC (5.86) | ||
58 | Evansville, IN (2.84) | 58 | Orem, UT (5.83) | ||
59 | Baton Rouge, LA (2.64) | 59 | Evanston, IL (5.81) | ||
60 | Eugene, OR (2.50) | 60 | Rock Hill, SC (5.80) | ||
61 | Boulder, CO (2.50) | 61 | Charleston, IL (5.77) | ||
62 | Norman, OK (2.40) | 62 | Moraga, CA (5.72) | ||
63 | Tuscaloosa, AL (2.33) | 63 | Huntington, WV (5.55) | ||
64 | Boise, ID (2.32) | 64 | Malibu, CA (5.32) | ||
65 | Murfreesboro, TN (2.16) | 65 | Santa Barbara, CA (5.24) | ||
66 | Peoria, IL (2.12) | 66 | Corvallis, OR (5.24) | ||
67 | Montgomery, AL (2.04) | 67 | Elon, NC (5.18) | ||
68 | Columbia, MO (1.96) | 68 | Oxford, MS (5.06) | ||
69 | Tempe, AZ (1.92) | 69 | Emmitsburg, MD (4.93) | ||
70 | Huntsville, AL (1.90) | 70 | East Lansing, MI (4.81) | ||
71 | Fort Collins, CO (1.77) | 71 | Auburn, AL (4.73) | ||
72 | Lafayette, LA (1.71) | 72 | Clinton, SC (4.71) | ||
73 | Toledo, OH (1.64) | 73 | Martin, TN (4.58) | ||
74 | Reno, NV (1.56) | 74 | Statesboro, GA (4.58) | ||
75 | Little Rock, AR (1.45) | 75 | Edwardsville, IL (4.53) | ||
76 | Jackson, MS (1.30) | 76 | Blacksburg, VA (4.47) | ||
77 | Las Cruces, NM (1.16) | 77 | Kent, OH (4.39) | ||
78 | Hampton, VA (0.74) | 78 | Rochester, MI (4.39) | ||
79 | Albany, NY (4.36) | ||||
80 | Fayetteville, AR (4.36) | ||||
81 | Murray, KY (4.26) | ||||
82 | Muncie, IN (4.25) | ||||
83 | Ypsilanti, MI (4.19) | ||||
84 | North Andover, MA (4.17) | ||||
85 | Nacogdoches, TX (4.07) | ||||
86 | Bowling Green, KY (4.07) | ||||
87 | Iowa City, IA (4.07) | ||||
88 | Orono, ME (4.03) | ||||
89 | Athens, OH (4.03) | ||||
90 | Kennesaw, GA (4.01) | ||||
91 | Burlington, VT (4.00) | ||||
92 | Normal, IL (3.92) | ||||
93 | Asheville, NC (3.90) | ||||
94 | West Lafayette, IN (3.89) | ||||
95 | Stillwater, OK (3.86) | ||||
96 | Boone, NC (3.85) | ||||
97 | Huntsville, TX (3.85) | ||||
97 | Valparaiso, IN (3.85) | ||||
99 | Starkville, MS (3.82) | ||||
100 | Mount Pleasant, MI (3.82) | ||||
101 | Boca Raton, FL (3.80) | ||||
102 | Poughkeepsie, NY (3.75) | ||||
103 | Hammond, LA (3.70) | ||||
104 | Davis, CA (3.70) | ||||
105 | Ithaca, NY (3.69) | ||||
106 | Brookings, SD (3.65) | ||||
107 | Cape Girardeau, MO (3.64) | ||||
108 | Logan, UT (3.61) | ||||
109 | Cookeville, TN (3.60) | ||||
110 | Macomb, IL (3.52) | ||||
111 | Grand Forks, ND (3.46) | ||||
112 | Orangeburg, SC (3.36) | ||||
113 | Prairie View, TX (3.30) | ||||
114 | South Orange Village, NJ (3.27) | ||||
115 | Lawrence, KS (3.23) | ||||
116 | Johnson City, TN (3.22) | ||||
117 | Morehead, KY | ||||
118 | Pullman, WA | ||||
119 | Thibodaux, LA | ||||
120 | Cullowhee, NC | ||||
121 | Lake Charles, LA | ||||
122 | Flagstaff, AZ | ||||
123 | New Rochelle, NY | ||||
124 | Lexington, VA | ||||
125 | Pine Bluff, AR | ||||
126 | Vermillion, SD | ||||
127 | Greenville, NC | ||||
128 | Laramie, WY | ||||
129 | DeLand, FL | ||||
130 | Natchitoches, LA | ||||
131 | Ogden, UT | ||||
132 | Manhattan, KS | ||||
133 | Ruston, LA | ||||
134 | Champaign, IL | ||||
135 | Hattiesburg, MS | ||||
136 | San Marcos, TX | ||||
137 | Missoula, MT | ||||
138 | Grambling, LA | ||||
139 | Jonesboro, AR | ||||
140 | Cheney, WA | ||||
141 | Itta Bena, MS | ||||
142 | Moscow, ID | ||||
143 | Terre Haute, IN | ||||
144 | Carbondale, IL | ||||
145 | Oxford, OH | ||||
146 | Jacksonville, AL | ||||
147 | Cedar City, UT | ||||
148 | Cedar Falls, IA | ||||
149 | Troy, AL | ||||
150 | Florence, AL | ||||
150 | Fayette, MS | ||||
152 | Coral Gables, FL | ||||
153 | Ames, IA | ||||
154 | Pocatello, ID | ||||
155 | St. George, UT | ||||
156 | Towson, MD | ||||
157 | Monroe, LA | ||||
158 | Youngstown, OH | ||||
159 | Dover, DE | ||||
160 | Richmond, KY |
Ask the Experts
Soccer is evolving, which is evident not only in rising attendance and viewership rates but also in the emergence of new sports TV networks and soccer clubs. For additional insight into soccer-related issues and trends, we turned to a panel of leading sports experts. Click on the experts’ profiles below to read their bios and thoughts on the following key questions:
- What are the biggest issues facing U.S. soccer today?
- What is the long-term outlook for professional soccer in the U.S.?
- To what extent has U.S. soccer embraced fantasy sports, including the daily-fantasy model?
- What, in your mind, makes a good soccer fan?
- If your child were an elite youth soccer player, would you encourage them to pursue the MLS/NWSL or a premier international league?
Ask the Experts
Frank Kohlenstein
Head Coach, Men's Soccer Program – University of Central Arkansas
Read More
Adam R. Cocco
Assistant Professor, Sport Administration – University of Louisville
Read More
Brennan K. Berg
Ph.D. – Associate Professor and Program Director, Sport and Recreation Administration, Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management – The University of Mississippi
Read More
Alex Voss
Lecturer, Sport and Recreation Management – University of Iowa
Read More
Ricard Jensen
Ph.D. – Assistant Professor of Practice, Department of Marketing, College of Business – University of Texas at San Antonio
Read More
Theodore Curtis
M.S., J.D. – Associate Professor of Sports Management, Director, Ice Hockey – Lynn University
Read More
Methodology
In order to determine the best cities for soccer fans, WalletHub compared 294 of the most populated U.S. cities across five divisions: 1) MLS (Division I Men’s), 2) NWSL (Division I Women’s), 3) USL (Division III Men’s), 4) College Soccer (Division I Men’s) and 5) College Soccer (Division I Women’s). For our sample, we chose cities with at least one college or professional soccer team.
We evaluated the five divisions using 52 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the most favorable conditions for soccer fans. In order to determine the weight for each division, we surveyed the top-performing five teams in each division’s Facebook account, summed the number of “Likes” and calculated the proportion that each league represented in total. The weight attributed to each division is therefore based on its popularity.
Finally, we determined each city’s weighted average across all metrics to calculate its overall score and used the resulting scores to rank-order the cities in our sample.
We also ranked the cities based on population size, using the following groupings:
- Large Cities: More than 300,000 people
- Midsize Cities: 100,000 to 300,000 people
- Small Cities: Fewer than 100,000 people
MLS (Div. I Men’s) – Total Points = 55
- Number of Teams: Full Weight (~6.47 Points)
- Performance Level: Full Weight (~6.47 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by dividing the number of wins by the total games played. The past three seasons’ average was used for this calculation. - Number of Championship Wins: Full Weight (~6.47 Points)
- Number of Regular Season Conference (2 conferences) Titles: Half Weight (~3.24 Points)
- Number of Hall of Fame Head Coaches who Conducted the Team: Half Weight (~3.24 Points)
- Franchise Value: Half Weight (~3.24 Points)
Note: This metric measures the team’s estimated value in millions of dollars. - Minimum Season-Ticket Price: Full Weight (~6.47 Points)
- Fan Engagement: Full Weight (~6.47 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by adding the number of Twitter followers and the number of Facebook “Likes” per capita. - Number of Coaches in Past 10 Seasons (Seasons 2012-13 to 2021-22): Half Weight (~3.24 Points)
- Stadium Capacity: Half Weight (~3.24 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by dividing stadium capacity by city population. - Attendance: Half Weight (~3.24 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by dividing average home-fan attendance by arena capacity. - Popularity Index: Half Weight (~3.24 Points)
NWSL (Div. I Women’s) – Total Points = 25
- Number of Teams: Full Weight (~3.13 Points)
- Performance Level: Full Weight (~3.13 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by dividing the number of wins by the total games played. The past three seasons’ average was used for this calculation. - Number of Championship Wins: Full Weight (~3.13 Points)
- Number of Regular Season League Titles: Half Weight (~1.56 Points)
- Number of Hall of Fame Head Coaches who Conducted the Team: Half Weight (~1.56 Points)
- Minimum Season-Ticket Price: Full Weight (~3.13 Points)
- Fan Engagement: Full Weight (~3.13 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by adding the number of Twitter followers and the number of Facebook “Likes” per capita. - Number of Coaches in Past 10 Seasons (Seasons 2012-13 to 2021-22): Half Weight (~1.56 Points)
- Stadium Capacity: Half Weight (~1.56 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by dividing stadium capacity by city population. - Attendance: Half Weight (~1.56 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by dividing average home-fan attendance by arena capacity. - Popularity Index: Half Weight (~1.56 Points)
USL (Div. III Men’s) – Total Points = 10
- Number of Teams: Full Weight (~1.25 Points)
- Performance Level: Full Weight (~1.25 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by dividing the number of wins by the total games played. The past three seasons’ average was used for this calculation. - Number of Championship Wins: Full Weight (~1.25 Points)
- Number of Regular Season Conference (2 conferences) Titles: Half Weight (~0.63 Points)
- Number of Hall of Fame Head Coaches who Conducted the Team: Half Weight (~0.63 Points)
- Minimum Season-Ticket Price: Full Weight (~1.25 Points)
- Fan Engagement: Full Weight (~1.25 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by adding the number of Twitter followers and the number of Facebook “Likes” per capita. - Number of Coaches in Past 10 Seasons (Seasons 2012-13 to 2021-22): Half Weight (~0.63 Points)
- Stadium Capacity: Half Weight (~0.63 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by dividing stadium capacity by city population. - Attendance: Half Weight (~0.63 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by dividing average home-fan attendance by arena capacity. - Popularity Index: Half Weight (~0.63 Points)
College Soccer (Div. I Men’s) – Total Points = 5
- Number of Teams: Full Weight (~0.71 Points)
- Performance Level: Full Weight (~0.71 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by dividing the number of wins by the total games played. The past three seasons’ average was used for this calculation. - Number of Championship Wins: Full Weight (~0.71 Points)
- Number of Conference Regular Season Titles: Half Weight (~0.36 Points)
- Number of Hall of Fame Head Coaches who Conducted the Team: Half Weight (~0.36 Points)
- Minimum Season-Ticket Price: Full Weight (~0.71 Points)
- Fan Engagement: Full Weight (~0.71 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by adding the number of Twitter followers and the number of Facebook “Likes” per capita. - Number of Coaches in Past 10 Seasons (Seasons 2012-13 to 2021-22): Half Weight (~0.36 Points)
- Stadium Capacity: Half Weight (~0.36 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by dividing stadium capacity by city population.
College Soccer (Div. I Women’s) – Total Points = 5
- Number of Teams: Full Weight (~0.71 Points)
- Performance Level: Full Weight (~0.71 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by dividing the number of wins by the total games played. The past three seasons’ average was used for this calculation. - Number of Championship Wins: Full Weight (~0.71 Points)
- Number of Conference Regular Season Titles: Half Weight (~0.36 Points)
- Number of Hall of Fame Head Coaches who Conducted the Team: Half Weight (~0.36 Points)
- Minimum Season-Ticket Price: Full Weight (~0.71 Points)
- Fan Engagement: Full Weight (~0.71 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by adding the number of Twitter followers and the number of Facebook “Likes” per capita. - Number of Coaches in Past 10 Seasons (Seasons 2012-13 to 2021-22): Half Weight (~0.36 Points)
- Stadium Capacity: Half Weight (~0.36 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by dividing stadium capacity by city population.
Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected from the U.S. Census Bureau, National Collegiate Athletic Association, ESPN, Soccer Stadium Digest, National Soccer Hall of Fame, FlashScore, Google Trends, Sportico, each conference’s website, each team’s website and each team’s social media accounts.
Supporting Video Files:
Was this article helpful?
Disclaimer: Editorial and user-generated content is not provided or commissioned by financial institutions. Opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and have not been approved or otherwise endorsed by any financial institution, including those that are WalletHub advertising partners. Our content is intended for informational purposes only, and we encourage everyone to respect our content guidelines. Please keep in mind that it is not a financial institution’s responsibility to ensure all posts and questions are answered.
Ad Disclosure: Certain offers that appear on this site originate from paying advertisers, and this will be noted on an offer’s details page using the designation "Sponsored", where applicable. Advertising may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear). At WalletHub we try to present a wide array of offers, but our offers do not represent all financial services companies or products.