Do you ever consider which seat will provide the best emergency protection when booking a flight? Most likely not.Most people reserve seats for reasons of convenience or comfort, such as space for their legs or easy access to the restroom.
A frequent traveller may choose a seat as close to the front as possible so they can get off the plane faster. It's uncommon for us to reserve a flight in the hopes of securing one of the middle seats in the final row. Guess what, though? According to statistics, these are the safest seats on board.
Jump To
The middle seat in the final seat is your safest bet
Unsplash
The middle rear seats of an aircraft had the lowest fatality rate: 28%, compared to 44% for the middle aisle seats, according to a TIME investigation that examined 35 years' worth of aircraft accident data.
This also makes logical sense. If there isn't a fire on that side, sitting next to an exit row will always give you the fastest exit in an emergency.
However, because the wings of a plane also serve as fuel storage areas, the middle exit rows are no longer the safest row options.
The likelihood of survival also depends on the nature of the emergency. Running into a mountain will drastically reduce your chances of surviving, as was the case in the tragic New Zealand disaster of 1979. 257 passengers and crew members perished when Air New Zealand Flight TE901 collided with the side of Mount Erebus in Antarctica.
In addition, there are fewer survivors when a plane lands in the ocean nose-first, as was the case with Air France Flight 447 in 2009, which had 228 fatalities among its crew and passengers.
However, in an emergency, aircraft are built to be very durable. In actuality, "clear air turbulence," which can occur at any time at high altitudes, is the main reason the cabin crew reminds us to keep our seat belts fastened and not the risk of a crash. This weather phenomenon has the potential to harm passengers and aircraft the most.
There's actually no need to worry so much
According to an analysis of census data by the US National Safety Council, the likelihood of dying in a plane is approximately 1 in 205,552, as opposed to 1 in 102 in a car. Even so, we don't pay much attention to fatal car accidents, but when we learn that an ATR72 crashed in Nepal, it immediately becomes the top news story.
We may be interested in plane crashes because we want to know why they occur or what the likelihood is that they will occur again. Perhaps it's even a good thing because it guarantees a thorough investigation into these tragic events, which helps maintain the safety of air travel.
To be completely honest, there is really no reason to be concerned about your safety when you board a commercial flight. But if you're still curious and have that nagging question in your head, keep reading.
What do you think about this? Tell us in the comments.
For more trending stories, follow us onTelegram.
As an aviation safety enthusiast with a deep understanding of the subject, I can affirm that the article provides valuable insights into the considerations passengers should have regarding their safety when flying. My expertise stems from a comprehensive knowledge of aviation safety protocols, accident investigations, and industry trends, coupled with a keen interest in disseminating accurate information to the public.
Now, delving into the concepts mentioned in the article:
-
Safest Seat on a Plane: The article suggests that statistically, the middle seats in the final row of an aircraft have the lowest fatality rate at 28%, compared to 44% for middle aisle seats. This conclusion is drawn from a TIME investigation that analyzed 35 years' worth of aircraft accident data. The rationale behind the safety of these seats is logical—sitting near the rear provides a quicker exit in the absence of fire on that side.
-
Exit Rows and Wing Safety: While sitting next to an exit row has traditionally been considered advantageous for a quick exit, the article highlights that the wings of a plane, which often house fuel storage, have reduced the safety of middle exit rows. This emphasizes the point that the safest seat can vary based on the nature of the emergency.
-
Nature of Emergencies: The article touches upon the nature of emergencies, citing examples such as the tragic Air New Zealand Flight TE901 collision with Mount Erebus and the nose-first landing of Air France Flight 447 in the ocean. It highlights that the circ*mstances of an emergency, such as crashing into a mountain or landing in the ocean nose-first, significantly impact the chances of survival.
-
Aircraft Durability and Clear Air Turbulence: Emphasizing the durability of aircraft in emergencies, the article mentions that aircraft are built to withstand various challenging situations. It notes that "clear air turbulence" at high altitudes is a significant concern for passenger safety, rather than the risk of a crash. This reinforces the importance of following safety protocols, such as keeping seat belts fastened.
-
Comparative Risk Analysis: The article puts the risk of dying in a plane crash into perspective by comparing it to other modes of transportation. It cites an analysis of census data by the US National Safety Council, stating that the likelihood of dying in a plane is approximately 1 in 205,552, compared to 1 in 102 in a car. This serves to alleviate concerns about air travel safety.
-
Public Perception and Media Coverage: The article touches upon the public's heightened interest in plane crashes and their immediate prominence in the news. It suggests that this attention might be due to a desire to understand why accidents occur and the likelihood of future incidents. Despite the low statistical risk, the public's curiosity about aviation safety persists.
In conclusion, the article provides a well-rounded perspective on airline safety, blending statistical analysis, historical examples, and a comparative risk assessment to assure readers of the overall safety of commercial flights.
