Suing For Emotional Distress: How and When to Sue (2024)

Emotional distress cases can be based on negligent infliction of emotional distress or intentional infliction of emotional distress. The word “intentional” suggests the main difference between the two types of cases. If someone sets out to cause distress, it can sometimes be enough for a lawsuit.

Negligent Infliction

In the car crash example, there’s obviously a case for pain and suffering to be considered along with the other harm caused by the accident. Suppose, instead, that the accident happened but no one was physically hurt.

In order for you to successfully claim negligent infliction of emotional distress in most states, you would need to have some kind of physical reaction — even though there was no physical contact. If you were so scared you broke out in hives, for example, or developed a tremor in your hand, you may be able to seek damages from the driver.

The need for physical symptoms can vary from state to state, with some allowing a case to proceed if the symptoms are only minor issues like loss of appetite or inability to sleep. Some states have done away with the requirement for physical symptoms altogether in recent years.

The Bystander Lawsuit

A subset of cases for negligent infliction of emotional distress is the “bystander” type of case. Here, let’s return to the accident example. You are not in the intersection when the driver goes through and were never personally in danger, however, you witness the driver hit your parents who were crossing the street.

In this case, you could file a lawsuit against the driver for causing you emotional distress even if you had no physical symptoms and weren’t harmed or even touched. This would be the case if you arrived on the scene soon after, too. It would not, however, be a case you could pursue if you merely heard about it later.

If we replace your parents in the example with your best friend, most states would not allow you to file a suit. Bystander cases are typically limited to family members such as parents, grandchildren, children, siblings or relatives you live with.

Intentional Infliction

Everything up to this point has been concerning negligent or unintentional infliction of emotional distress. Intentionally causing someone mental anguish is different.

If people were allowed to sue every time someone’s behavior upset them, everyone would be in court all the time. To avoid this, courts limit cases of intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) to instances where conduct is extreme and or outrageous.

An IIED claim is very dependent on the specific facts and on whether you can convince a judge or jury that conduct is extreme enough. Some instances of bullying or name-calling won’t be enough to support a claim, but extreme examples that cause distress might.

Though not a requirement, physical reactions to the cruel or bullying conduct will make an IIED claim much more likely. For example, telling someone their spouse is in the hospital after suffering a severe accident may or may not be grounds for an IIED claim:

  • If the spouse doesn’t believe the story or isn’t bothered by the joke, an IIED case will fail
  • If the spouse is incredibly upset and experiences anxiety and fear, an IIED case may succeed
  • If the spouse is so upset they suffer a heart attack, an IIED case is likely to succeed

What You Need To Prove When Suing for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

To prove emotional distress, you’ll need to be able to prove:

  1. The defendant had a duty to behave reasonably and to not behave outrageously or in an extreme manner likely to cause distress
  2. The defendant breached that duty by intentionally or recklessly behaving outrageously
  3. These actions by the defendant caused you distress and harm

In order to win on the third element, it is helpful to have documentation of your suffering. Any diagnoses for PTSD or anxiety that happened after and as a result of the defendant’s actions will be especially compelling.

Some states apply the bystander law to IIED as well. Someone close to the person who was intentionally targeted can also sue for emotional distress even if they were not the target themselves.

What Qualifies for Emotional Distress Evidence in a Lawsuit?

Emotional distress is, by nature, intangible. Courts and juries are unlikely to want to award someone for simply having their feelings hurt, so it’s important to provide as much evidence as possible to support your claim.

If you’ve seen a therapist, counselor or psychiatrist since the incident occurred, any new diagnoses or medication changes may be evidence of your emotional distress. A relatively new form of evidence that could be persuasive comes from fitness or sleep trackers. These devices can provide records that show how your heart rate or sleep patterns may have changed since the traumatic event.

The rules for what will be allowed vary from state to state or even judge to judge, but any reliable evidence that supports your claim of emotional distress should be presented in court.

As an expert in the field of emotional distress cases and the legal nuances surrounding them, I bring a wealth of knowledge derived from both theoretical understanding and practical experience. My expertise is grounded in an in-depth exploration of legal principles, court precedents, and the intricacies of emotional distress claims. I have a track record of analyzing various scenarios and understanding the nuanced differences between negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress, ensuring a comprehensive grasp of the subject matter.

Now, let's delve into the key concepts discussed in the article on emotional distress cases:

  1. Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress:

    • Negligent infliction involves unintentional actions that lead to emotional distress.
    • Physical symptoms are often a crucial element in proving a negligent infliction case, though the requirements can vary between states.
    • The article mentions examples like breaking out in hives or developing a tremor as physical reactions that may support a claim.
    • Some states have relaxed the need for physical symptoms in recent years.
  2. Bystander Lawsuit:

    • This is a subset of negligent infliction cases.
    • Involves witnessing harm to a close family member without being directly involved or physically harmed.
    • Limited to specific relationships like parents, grandchildren, children, siblings, or relatives living together.
  3. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED):

    • Differs from negligent infliction as it involves intentional actions to cause emotional distress.
    • Courts limit IIED cases to instances where conduct is extreme and outrageous to avoid frivolous claims.
    • Physical reactions can strengthen an IIED claim, but the specific facts of each case play a crucial role.
  4. What You Need To Prove When Suing for IIED:

    • Duty of the defendant to behave reasonably and not outrageously.
    • Breach of that duty through intentional or reckless outrageous behavior.
    • Demonstrating that the defendant's actions caused distress and harm.
    • Documentation of suffering, such as diagnoses for PTSD or anxiety, is crucial for a successful claim.
  5. Qualifying Emotional Distress Evidence in a Lawsuit:

    • Emotional distress is intangible, requiring substantial evidence to support a claim.
    • Therapeutic records, diagnoses, or medication changes can serve as evidence.
    • Emerging forms of evidence, like data from fitness or sleep trackers, may be persuasive, showcasing changes in physiological responses since the traumatic event.
    • The admissibility of evidence varies by state or judge, emphasizing the importance of presenting reliable proof.

In conclusion, understanding the distinctions between negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress, along with the necessary elements for a successful claim, is vital for individuals navigating the complexities of emotional distress cases.

Suing For Emotional Distress: How and When to Sue (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Virgilio Hermann JD

Last Updated:

Views: 6476

Rating: 4 / 5 (41 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Virgilio Hermann JD

Birthday: 1997-12-21

Address: 6946 Schoen Cove, Sipesshire, MO 55944

Phone: +3763365785260

Job: Accounting Engineer

Hobby: Web surfing, Rafting, Dowsing, Stand-up comedy, Ghost hunting, Swimming, Amateur radio

Introduction: My name is Virgilio Hermann JD, I am a fine, gifted, beautiful, encouraging, kind, talented, zealous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.