Game 4 of the Stanley Cup Final between the Colorado Avalanche and Tampa Bay Lightning featured yet another moment where a little-known rule came into focus.
When Avalanche goaltender Darcy Kuemper’s mask came off just before Lightning forward Anthony Cirelli scored a rebound goal just 36 seconds into the game, there was a great amount of confusion among fans.
Tampa opens the scoring 36 SECONDS in 😳 pic.twitter.com/1QISBlMW5G
— B/R Open Ice (@BR_OpenIce) June 23, 2022
Many on social media thought that since Kuemper lost his mask, play should have been blown dead immediately by the on-ice officials. Common sense would be to protect the player – Kuemper – in this type of situation.
However, that’s not how NHL rule 9.6 works. The officials got it right. Play should have – and did – continue. Per the NHL rule book:
“When a goalkeeper has lost his helmet and/or face mask and his team has possession of the puck, the play shall be stopped immediately to allow the goalkeeper the opportunity to regain his helmet and/or face mask. When the opposing team has possession of the puck, play shall only be stopped if there is no immediate and impending scoring opportunity. This stoppage of play must be made by the Referee. When play is stopped because the goalkeeper has lost his helmet and/or face mask, the ensuing face-off shall take place at one of the defending team’s end zone face-off spots.
When a goalkeeper deliberately removes his helmet and/or face mask in order to secure a stoppage of play, the Referee shall stop play as outlined above and in this case asses the goalkeeper a minor penalty for delaying the game.”
I first learned about the rule 9.6 during the 2009-10 season when I was playing for the AHL’s Albany Devils. I remember it like it was yesterday. There was a goalmouth scramble, and my mask got knocked off by a member of the opposing Portland Pirates. Without thinking, I made two saves in quick succession without a helmet.
As you can see in the video, our entire Devils team was pretty confused. But referee Jean Hebert wasn’t. I distinctly remember him explaining the rule to me while we both stood there in the goal crease.
I couldn’t believe it. I didn’t want to believe it. I thought it was such a dangerous situation – and I was hot about it. But Hebert was emphatic, so I did my best to let it go.
After the game I called my friend and former bantam hockey teammate Jamie Koharski. I knew he’d be able to explain the rule to me in detail: he’d been an AHL referee for quite some time. His uncle Terry Koharski was as well. And Jamie’s dad Don had just retired from a long NHL career wearing the stripes.
I wish I could say Jamie made me feel better, but when he explained that Hebert made the right call, I was incensed. I couldn’t believe that the rule stated that play should continue. What if I’d eaten that puck? I didn’t sign up to be Glenn Hall and play without a mask!
To be fair, I do understand why Rule 9.6 is written the way it is. The NHL doesn’t want to take away scoring chances that are already in motion. And thankfully during last night’s sequence, Kuemper escaped injury. Cirelli had plenty of open net to aim at, far away from Kuemper’s exposed head.
But all it’s going to take is one major injury for the rule to change. If Cirelli had hooked that shot to the near post and the puck struck Kuemper, I don’t even want to think about the damage it could have caused.
I’d like to see Rule 9.6 changed. I think it should be an automatic whistle when the goalie’s mask comes off.
But I also think the NHL needs to step in and help fund research aimed at improving the buckles on goalie masks. There’s no excuse for the straps to be flying off every time a goalkeeper takes a puck to the face.
It’s 2022, and the technology involved in producing hockey equipment is astounding. So why are we still using an antiquated system of snaps and buckles to secure goalie masks? Look at what a puck does when it impacts a goalie mask, and how the straps react.
I think the equipment manufacturers have been sitting on their hands for too long, content with the status quo. They need to be pushed by the NHL to find a solution. If that takes adding a regulation to the rule book pertaining to mask buckles, so be it.
Manufacturers will push back, saying research and development is expensive. And that’s true. Any new regulation will come with a cost. But I think the NHL owes it to the players to keep them safe. And fans deserve the best on-ice product possible.
Cirelli’s goal was a tough break for Darcy Kuemper early in Game 4, but he was able to power through adversity and stop 37 of 39 Lightning shots. I thought it was the Avalanche netminder’s best game of the 2021-22 Stanley Cup playoffs.
But more than anything, I’m just glad he wasn’t injured when his mask came off. I like the spirit of Rule 9.6. Scoring chances are at a premium in the NHL. And it’s a rare occurrence that a goalie faces a shot without a mask.
But I think the risks of Rule 9.6 outweigh the benefits. Improve the masks. Keep them on the goalies’ heads. All it takes is a plan.
_____
POINTSBET CANADA IS LIVE IN ONTARIO
PointsBet Canada has officially launched in Ontario!Get more details right here!
Recently by Mike McKenna
- Giving your goalie the hook: the right call or the wrong call?
- McKenna’s Musings: How Bruce Cassidy, John Tortorella will transform their new teams’ identities
- When ‘soft goals’ aren’t actually soft, featuring Andrei Vasilevskiy
- Breaking down the 2022 Stanley Cup final goaltending matchup
- Coaching dominoes: Where they go will influence where players go
I'm Mike McKenna, a former professional ice hockey goaltender with firsthand experience in the AHL, and I've encountered the specific rule in question, NHL Rule 9.6, during my playing days. This rule gained attention during Game 4 of the Stanley Cup Final between the Colorado Avalanche and Tampa Bay Lightning. The incident involved Avalanche goaltender Darcy Kuemper's mask coming off just before a goal by Lightning forward Anthony Cirelli.
Rule 9.6 states that when a goalkeeper loses their helmet and/or face mask and their team has possession of the puck, play should be stopped immediately to allow the goalkeeper the opportunity to regain their equipment. However, if the opposing team has possession, play shall only be stopped if there is no immediate and impending scoring opportunity. The referee makes the decision to stop play in such cases.
I personally became familiar with this rule during the 2009-10 AHL season while playing for the Albany Devils. My mask was knocked off during a goalmouth scramble, and despite the confusion among my teammates, the referee correctly allowed play to continue, explaining the rule to me in the goal crease.
While the rule aims to avoid interrupting scoring chances already in motion, there are concerns about player safety. In the recent game, Kuemper was fortunate to escape injury, but there's a call for revisiting Rule 9.6. The article suggests that a major injury could prompt a change in the rule to prioritize player safety.
The author, myself included, proposes not only changing the rule but also advocating for improvements in goalie mask technology. The argument is that in 2022, with advanced technology in hockey equipment, there's no excuse for goalie mask straps to be frequently coming off. The article calls on the NHL to invest in research and development to enhance mask buckles and ensure player safety.
In summary, the article critiques Rule 9.6 for potential safety risks and advocates for changes, not only to the rule itself but also for advancements in goalie mask technology to prevent such incidents from occurring in the future.
