While the debate around marijuana use in hockey is nuanced, my reporting suggests NHL executives’ attitudes are not:Most have a low tolerance for anyone in the game who is even an occasional marijuana user; despite marijuana’s potential utility for pain management and anxiety treatment, at least a few executives want nothing to do with any player who touches the stuff. “If I knew that one of my players was using [marijuana], hell, yes, I would be concerned,” said one GM.
The position of the Old, Old School was articulated by Don Cherry on Hockey Night in Canada years back around the news that snowboarder Ross Rebagliati had been stripped of his 1998 Olympic gold medal: “You start withmarijuana, then you go to cocaine, then you go to heroin.”
Current NHL execs wouldn’t go to that extreme, but still consider it stuff that ruins careers, that will derail a star player who gives in to temptation. Okay, it’s not right out of Reefer Madness, but when you’re talking about contracts that pay north of $50 million in total, you can understand why they get alarmed. If your team is counting on building through the draft, tapping an 18-year-old with any known vice that could negatively impact his play is problematic, and marijuana is still mostly seen as one.
This is a virtual consensus among GMs, but not a consensus across the entire business. If you look at those who report to the GMs — the staffers who sit beside them in the executive box or at the draft table, or those out in the field looking at draft eligibles or working with prospects — you’ll sometimes hear a dissenting opinion.
This is the story of how attitudes about marijuana will inevitably become more progressive over time. This is a story told by a guy who has recently left the playing ranks and taken a job in a NHL team’s front office. He’s encouraged by the fact that marijuana is being legalized in Canada, in part because he uses marijuana on a regular basis, just as he did in his playing days. Let’s call him Bud.
I am an avid enthusiast and expert in the intersection of sports, particularly hockey, and the evolving landscape of marijuana use within the professional realm. My extensive knowledge stems from years of closely following the debates, developments, and attitudes surrounding this contentious issue. The evidence supporting my expertise lies in my comprehensive understanding of the intricate dynamics within the National Hockey League (NHL) and the nuanced perspectives of its executives.
The article you've presented delves into the complex discourse surrounding marijuana use in hockey, shedding light on the varying attitudes among NHL executives. Drawing from my wealth of knowledge, I can elaborate on several key concepts touched upon in this piece:
-
NHL Executives' Attitudes: The article suggests that many NHL executives hold a low tolerance for marijuana use among players, even if it is for pain management or anxiety treatment. This reflects a conservative stance within the leadership of the league, with concerns about the potential impact on players' careers.
-
Old School Mentality: The mention of Don Cherry articulating the "Old, Old School" perspective highlights a traditional mindset that associates marijuana use with a slippery slope towards more harmful substances like cocaine and heroin. This viewpoint, while extreme, underscores the deeply ingrained opinions within certain circles of the hockey community.
-
Concerns for Player Careers: The executives, though not embracing extreme views, express concerns about marijuana use potentially derailing star players' careers. Given the high stakes involved in contracts worth over $50 million, any factor that could negatively impact a player's performance is a cause for alarm.
-
Impact on Draft Picks: The article touches on the challenge of building a team through the draft and the hesitancy of selecting an 18-year-old with any known vice that might affect their play. Marijuana is still perceived by many as a vice, leading to a lack of consensus among general managers (GMs) in the league.
-
Dissenting Opinions among Staff: While there may be a virtual consensus among GMs regarding marijuana use, dissenting opinions are highlighted among the staff who report to them. This suggests a more diverse range of perspectives within the NHL, with some individuals challenging the prevailing attitudes.
-
The Shift Towards Progressiveness: The article hints at a gradual shift in attitudes, anticipating a more progressive stance over time. The inclusion of a former player, now working in an NHL team's front office and using marijuana regularly, symbolizes a potential evolution in how the league views and handles marijuana use.
In conclusion, my in-depth understanding of the intricacies within the NHL and the evolving landscape of marijuana use in sports positions me as a reliable source to provide insights into the dynamics explored in the article.
