Uncertainty stands around multibillion USDC empire as issuer Circle held reserves at Silicon Valley Bank | TechCrunch (2024)

Update: After publication and our first update to include Circle’s initial statement regarding USDC’s reserves, the company announced that “3.3 billion of the ~$40 billion of USDC reserves remain at SVB,” or a hair more than a third of the cash the company had previously detailed it held in January. In the wake of the news, USDC depegged from its $1 target, and is currently trading at around 92 cents on the dollar. About half an hour after Circle’s tweet last evening, Coinbase said that it was “temporarily pausing USDC:USD conversions over the weekend while banks are closed,” adding that it planned to “recommence conversions” when banks opened on Monday.

While the startup world digests the shocking implosion of well-known financial institution Silicon Valley Bank, the fallout may extend to the crypto world as well. One stablecoin in particular, USDC, was known as of January 17 to have held some of its backing capital at SVB, funds that are likely now illiquid for several days.

When TechCrunch reached out to Circle, the issuer of USDC, for comment on the state of the stablecoin’s reserves, a spokesperson said, “we’re working on this internally, and I’ll keep you posted when I have a response to share.” It is possible that the company moved cash from SVB before it wasn’t able to Thursday; it is also possible that the company had previously removed funds from the bank since its latest asset disclosures.

A Circle spokesperson said Friday that “Silicon Valley Bank is one of six banking partners Circle uses for managing the approximately 25% portion of USDC reserves held in cash. While we await clarity on how the FDIC receivership of SVB will impact its depositors, Circle & USDC continue to operate normally.”

According to Circle’s January attestation report, the firm had about $9.88 billion in cash deposited at regulated banks to back its stablecoin’s value, among other assets. The per-bank allocations were not disclosed, but the cash was held at regulated financial institutions like Bank of New York Mellon, Citizens Trust Bank, Customers Bank, New York Community Bank (a division of Flagstar Bank, N.A.), Signature Bank and, most notably, Silicon Valley Bank and Silvergate Bank.

If Circle did have more than a smattering of cash at SVB, concerns could mount that the backing of USDC may no longer be complete and instead be more fractional than is needed for a stablecoin to remain steady.

Two banks that USDC mentioned using, SVB and Silvergate, made headlines this week for separate but similar reasons. SVB was taken over by regulators and shut down on Friday after the bank announced on Wednesday that it lost $1.8 billion on the sale of U.S. treasuries and mortgage-backed securities that it invested in, owing to rising interest rates. Its efforts to raise more capital and reshape its capital profile to bolster its interest income failed to conserve investor and customer confidence in its health.

Silvergate, a publicly traded crypto-friendly financial institution, shared on Wednesday that it would “wind down operations and voluntarily liquidate” its bank division, which some analysts anticipate will cause problems for the larger digital asset ecosystem.

However, last week, Circle said it moved “the small percentage of USDC reserve deposits held at Silvergate” to other banking partners. “This process of winding down our relationship with Silvergate began last year, as signs of trouble and broader crypto asset risk exposure became increasingly apparent.” This could limit the stablecoin’s potential risk to unstable banking partners.

USDC is the second-largest stablecoin by market capitalization with a $43.5 billion circulating supply and over $6.3 billion in daily traded volume, up 92.33% in the past 24 hours, according to CoinMarketCap data. At the time of publication, USDC held steady at its $1 value.

The stablecoin is pegged to the U.S. dollar on a 1:1 basis and is backed through reserves consisting of a mix of cash and short-term U.S. Treasury bonds. Of that circulating supply about $11.4 billion cash is held at reserve banks as of March 2, Circle’s website states. (Coinbase, which held a total of $2 billion worth of USDC on its books at the end of its fourth quarter in a hybrid of customer and corporate funds, fell 8% today in regular trading.)

It’s also worth noting USDC was launched by Circle and Coinbase in 2018, so it makes sense that Coinbase held a fair amount of it internally.

This story was updated at 4:32 p.m. PT Friday to include a statement from Circle.

Uncertainty stands around multibillion USDC empire as issuer Circle held reserves at Silicon Valley Bank | TechCrunch (2024)

FAQs

What was the problem at Silicon Valley Bank? ›

SVB stockholders and investors took a big hit because, unlike customers, they were not backed by FDIC on their investment. Other issues include a lack of money from deposits for immediate expenses such as payroll.

How much did USDC have in Silicon Valley Bank? ›

USD Coin (USDC) came close to regaining its dollar peg on Monday after Circle, which issues the stablecoin, said that the $3.3 billion it held with the now-collapsed Silicon Valley Bank will be “fully available” when U.S. banks open.

Why are investors concerned about US regional banks following the events at Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank? ›

The decline in commercial real estate valuations led to worries about whether some regional banks would see higher default rates from borrowers in the commercial real estate sector, and thereby incur greater losses. Second, in order to fight off inflation, the Federal Reserve (Fed) raised interest rates aggressively.

Why Silicon Valley Bank's safe investments turned into a problem for banks and the Fed? ›

But as the Federal Reserve increased interest rates in response to high inflation, Silicon Valley Bank's bonds became riskier investments. Because investors could buy bonds at higher interest rates, Silicon Valley Bank's bonds declined in value.

Who is responsible for Silicon Valley Bank failure? ›

Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) failed because of a textbook case of mismanagement by the bank. Its senior leadership failed to manage basic interest rate and liquidity risk. Its board of directors failed to oversee senior leadership and hold them accountable.

Who owns Silicon Valley Bank? ›

What bank is failing in 2024? ›

Republic First Bank's demise on April 26 was the first failure of 2024. Its collapse renewed fears that last year's financial instability is still lingering. Republic First Bank was shuttered last week by its state regulator and taken over by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

Are banks crashing in 2024? ›

WASHINGTON (TND) — The U.S. had its first bank failure of 2024 with federal regulators seizing control of Pennsylvania-based Republic First over the weekend, which comes a year after a string of larger regional banks collapsed in spectacular fashion and fueled fears of a run on deposits and shook faith in the financial ...

What US bank collapsed in 2024? ›

Republic First becomes first casualty of U.S. bank crisis in 2024.

What banks are collapsing? ›

Earlier last year Silicon Valley Bank failed March 10, 2023, and then Signature Bank failed two days later, ending the unusual streak of more than 800 days without a bank failure. Before Citizens Bank failed in November 2023, Heartland Tri-State Bank failed July 28, 2023 and First Republic Bank failed May 1, 2023.

What happens to loans when a bank collapses? ›

The bottom line. Learning that your lender has gone bankrupt can be nervewracking, however, there's not much to worry about. The terms of your loan should remain unchanged, even if the account is being handled by a different institution.

Why are US banks collapsing? ›

Most US banks were similarly exposed to customer withdrawals and underwater bond portfolios, while the Credit Suisse collapse demonstrated the potential for contagion. The Fed's BTFP stopped the panic by allowing US banks to borrow from the central bank using their bonds as collateral.

What was the main reason for the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank? ›

He testified that "SVB failed because the bank's management did not effectively manage its interest rate and liquidity risk, and the bank then suffered a devastating and unexpected run by its uninsured depositors in a period of less than 24 hours".

What caused the Silicon Valley Bank to crash? ›

SVB was shut down and taken over by the U.S. government after a slew of startups and venture capitalists withdrew their money en masse amid fears over its financial health. “They didn't hedge the interest rate,” Glover said. “This is really basic banking, it's nothing to do with the tech community.

Was Silicon Valley Bank too big to fail? ›

Most significant, the nation learned over the weekend that Silicon Valley Bank, the 16th largest depository institution in the United States, was deemed by the government to be too big to fail — at least in the sense that the normal rules for allocating losses were set aside.

Why did SVB have so many uninsured deposits? ›

That's because FDIC deposit insurance is meant for everyday bank customers and maxes out at $250,000. Many Silicon Valley startups had millions, or even hundreds of millions of dollars deposited at the bank—money they used to run their companies and pay employees. Right now, nobody's sure how much of that cash is left.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Madonna Wisozk

Last Updated:

Views: 6452

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (48 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Madonna Wisozk

Birthday: 2001-02-23

Address: 656 Gerhold Summit, Sidneyberg, FL 78179-2512

Phone: +6742282696652

Job: Customer Banking Liaison

Hobby: Flower arranging, Yo-yoing, Tai chi, Rowing, Macrame, Urban exploration, Knife making

Introduction: My name is Madonna Wisozk, I am a attractive, healthy, thoughtful, faithful, open, vivacious, zany person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.