Home>Entertainment
Baby Groot ≠ Original Groot
ByAngie Han on
Baby Groot looks how we feel.Credit: Marvel Studios
RIP, Groot, we hardly knew you were dead.
SEE ALSO:
How 'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2' raises the stakes of the Marvel Cinematic UniverseDirector James Gunn broke a million hearts today when he confirmed that, yes, Groot dies at the end of the first Guardians of the Galaxy. Baby Groot is his son, not his resurrected form.
Tweet may have been deleted
Predictably, the internet went wild with grief. And yes, I'm including myself here.
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
But ... this isn't exactly news.
We've known Groot was dead for years. Well, kinda.
As Gunn goes on to note, this is far from the first time he's confirmed that, yes, Groot is dead. Indeed, he's been having different versions of this conversation basically since the first Guardians came out.
Back in the day, he used to be cagier about the answer. In November 2014, a few months after Guardians hit theaters, he answered a question about whether or not Groot was invincible with another question: "Is Baby Groot, Groot? Or is Baby Groot actully Groot's progeny?"
A few months later, he said Groot "might be dead." A few months after that, when a fan asked on Facebook whether Baby Groot was Groot's son, Gunn replied that it was "complicated," and added that Baby Groot does not retain the original Groot's memories.
(Worth noting: Apparently, even Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige's been confused by this question – he told press in 2016 that Baby Groot has Groot's memories, which is incorrect.)
By last year, though, Gunn was being very clear about his answer. "Baby Groot is not Groot," he stressed in a March 2017 interview with SFX (via GamesRadar). "He’s a different character and he does not have that character’s memories."
When the issue came up yet again last fall, Gunn said in no uncertain terms that "Groot is dead," explaining:
Although I don't necessarily think it's obvious in Vol. 1, it's important to say that if you exploded and a little glob of you started growing into a baby, I would not assume that baby was you.
I do think it's more obvious in Vol. 2, as Baby Groot has a different personality than Groot, none of his memories, and is much, much dumber.
Plus, like ... what does "dead" even mean for Groot?
Still, some fans aren't buying it – leaving Gunn to debate them on social media.
Tweet may have been deleted
One even brought real science into this science-fiction conversation:
Tweet may have been deleted
Anyway, Gunn's answer actually just raises more questions, if you think about it. Such as:
Tweet may have been deleted
And:
Tweet may have been deleted
And:
Tweet may have been deleted
Now we're veering toward Black Mirror territory. Because, like ... is it? Does Baby Groot really count as a separate entity if he's literally just a growing piece of the original Groot? Would they still be considered different Groots if both of them were still alive? I don't know, is Digital Nanette the same person as Real World Nanette in "U.S.S. Callister"? Is a consciousness what makes a person?
Is it possible to get a new Groot without killing the old one, or is that seriously the only way to bring new Groots into the world? Does that mean all the other Groot splinters left over from the original could have been sentient beings, too? What does it even mean to be sentient in a reality where Ultrons and Visions exist? Why am I getting so worked up over the personhood of a CG tree alien?
And then there's this cold hard fact:
Tweet may have been deleted
Maybe that's the real reason all of us keep forgetting Groot has really died: It's just too dang sad to remember the truth.
Featured Video For You
Watch this actress get transformed for 'Guardians of the Galaxy'
TopicsComics
Recommended For You
Everything you need to know about Netflix's '3 Body Problem'
From book differences to deeply ambitious physics explainers, we've got you covered.
By Shannon Connellan
'Renegade Nell' review: All hail Louisa Harland's highwaywoman!
The "Derry Girls" star slays in this new show from "Happy Valley" creator Sally Wainwright.
By Belen Edwards
'3 Body Problem's £20 million star is the worst part of the entire show
It's a worthless piece of paper.
By Amanda Yeo
Here's why '3 Body Problem' is set in the UK
Oxford and London have starring roles where they didn't in the books.
By Sam Haysom
Why '3 Body Problem' picks the perfect gamer names
Copernicus? Nice.
By Shannon Connellan
Trending on Mashable
NYT Connections today: See hints and answers for April 4
Everything you need to solve 'Connections' #298.
By Mashable Team
NYT Connections today: See hints and answers for April 3
Everything you need to solve 'Connections' #297.
By Mashable Team
Yet another former Twitter/X exec is suing Elon Musk for millions in unpaid severance
They could form a club at this point.
By Amanda Yeo
iOS 17.5 beta 1 is here: 3 new features coming to your iPhone
The new update includes an anti-stalking feature for tracking devices.
By Kimberly Gedeon
The biggest stories of the day delivered to your inbox.
This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time.
Thanks for signing up. See you at your inbox!
- TECH
- SCIENCE
- LIFE
- SOCIAL GOOD
- ENTERTAINMENT
- BEST PRODUCTS
- DEALS
- About Mashable
- Contact Us
- We're Hiring
- Newsletters
- Sitemap
Mashable supports Group Black and its mission to increase greater diversity in media voices and media ownership. Group Black's collective includes Essence, TheShadeRoom and Afro-Punk.
©2005–2024 Mashable, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All Rights Reserved.
Mashable is a registered trademark of Ziff Davis and may not be used by third parties without express written permission.
- About Ziff Davis
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Use
- Advertise
- Accessibility
- Do Not Sell My Personal Information