Do robo-advisors beat human advisors?
If you require a high level of personalized service and direct management of your investments, a traditional human advisor might be better suited to your needs. Conversely, if cost and simplicity are your primary concerns, a robo-advisor might be the better choice.
The type of advisor that is better for you depends on what your financial needs are. For core investing and planning advice, a robo-advisor is a great solution because it automates much of the work that a human advisor does. And it charges less for doing so – potential savings for you.
Robo-advisor and financial advisors can both help you invest successfully. However, your specific financial circ*mstances will help you determine which one is better for you. For example, if you're just starting to invest your money, the low fees and lack of minimums may make robo-advisors a wise choice.
In terms of cost, robo-advisors are much less expensive than financial advisors but still more expensive than doing it yourself. They may charge a monthly fee, such as $5 per month, or an annual management fee of 0.25% to 0.50% of your assets under management.
It's About More Than Just Investments
The most sophisticated robo-advisors may offer automatic portfolio rebalancing and tax-loss harvesting, but they don't come close to providing the full range of services that human financial advisors offer. As people move through life, their priorities and financial goals evolve.
High-net-worth investors exited robo-advisor arrangements at the highest rates. Here's how the data broke down along asset levels: $50,000 or less: A drop from 23.6% to 20.6% in 2022, which translates to a decrease of 3 percentage points.
Limited Flexibility. If you want to sell call options on an existing portfolio or buy individual stocks, most robo-advisors won't be able to help you. There are sound investment strategies that go beyond an investing algorithm.
Do robo-advisors outperform the S&P 500? Robo-advisors can outperform the S&P 500 or they can underperform it. It depends on the timing and what they have you invested in. Many robo-advisors will put a percentage of your portfolio in an index fund or a variety of funds intended to track the S&P 500.
Robo-advisors offer the convenience of a hands-off investment management strategy at a lower cost. However, if you prefer more human interaction and need recommendations based on a more nuanced view of your overall financial picture, a financial advisor could be the way to go.
Learn more about how we review products and read our advertiser disclosure for how we make money. According to our research, Wealthfront is the best overall robo-advisor due to its vast customization options, fee-free stock investing, low-interest rate borrowing, dynamic tax-loss harvesting, and other key features.
What is the ROI of a robo-advisor?
Robo-advisor performance is one way to understand the value of digital advice. Learn how fees, enhanced features, and investment options can also be key considerations. Five-year returns from most robo-advisors range from 2%–5% per year.
Markets can be unpredictable, and no form of investing is immune to potential losses. Robo-advisors, like human advisors, cannot guarantee profits or protect entirely against losses, especially during market downturns—even with well-diversified portfolios.
Robo-advisors provide these services at a low cost, which makes them an attractive option when compared with some traditional advisory firms that can require clients to have anywhere between $25,000 and $200,000 or more to open an account and have access to an expert who will help you manage your investments.
Robo-advisors lack the ability to do complex financial planning that brings together your estate, tax, and retirement goals. They also cannot take into account your insurance, general budgeting, and savings needs.
Generally, financial advisors are typically better fits for those looking for help making financial decisions or making investments. Financial planners, on the other hand, are a better fit for someone looking to map out their financial goals and make a long-term plan.
The return on investment will vary by portfolio, and not everyone will have the same investment mix. Most robo-advisors don't have a long track record. But according to the Robo Report, the five-year returns (2017 to 2022) from most robo-advisors range from 2% to 5% per year.
Suppose you're starting from scratch and have no savings. You'd need to invest around $13,000 per month to save a million dollars in five years, assuming a 7% annual rate of return and 3% inflation rate. For a rate of return of 5%, you'd need to save around $14,700 per month.
- Vanguard Personal and Digital Advisor Services. $118.99 billion. 348,113. 12/31/2022.
- Empower (Formerly Personal Capital) $99.8 billion. 188,081. 6/14/2023.
- Schwab Intelligent Portfolios. $66.08 billion. 495,347. 12/31/2022.
- Betterment. $36.63 billion. 1,023,431. 05/01/2023.
- Wealthfront.
Last year, roughly 30 million Americans used robo-advisors to grow their assets. Statista expects another 20 million people in the US to start using their services in the next four years, pushing the total user count to nearly 50 million.
The frequency of portfolio rebalancing by a robo-advisor is ongoing and automatic. This is one of the many benefits of using a robo-advisor like Daffy. Unlike most investors who only rebalance their portfolio idiosyncratically, maybe once a year or every couple of years when they remember, robo-advisors never forget.
Why do you think Millennials are twice as likely to use robo-advisors than older generations?
According to a Vanguard survey (2020), Millennials are twice as likely as older American investors to consider using a robo-advisor: together with Generation Z, they have grown up in a Tech-laden world and they are more likely to seek financial advice in the age of Covid-19 (the United States is by far the leading ...
Considering the range of robo-advisors we review, Vanguard Digital Advisor's 0.15% management fee is on the lower end. However, some of these robos provide access to human advisors, so it makes more sense to compare Vanguard's fees with other similar offerings without human guidance.
Research: 89% of fund managers fail to beat the market
S&P Dow Jones Indices regularly researches how actively managed mutual funds perform compared to the S&P500 index. These are funds that actively buy and sell assets and are managed by professionals, often with very high salaries from the management fees.
- Betterment.
- Wealthfront.
- Charles Schwab.
- Ellevest.
- SoFi Invest.
Robo-advisors cost less than traditional financial advisors. These electronic advisors typically impose annual fees of around 0.5% of assets under management, compared with 1% to 2% charged by many human advisors.
