What's next for Bruins, Mitchell Miller? Why he's still on the payroll, and 4 potential paths forward (2024)

Technically, Mitchell Miller is still a Bruin. His three-year entry-level contract is active. He is accruing an annual AHL salary of $82,500.

And all of this is happening more than a week after the Bruins parted ways with him on Nov. 6, citing a lack of due diligence.

Even though Miller will never play a game for the Bruins, his continued employment shows the persistent situation his signing has caused. The team cannot terminate his employment without facing a grievance that the NHLPA would be likely to pursue. For now, the Bruins remain obligated to the contract, which was signed Nov. 4 and registered by the NHL a day later amid public and internal backlash over his history of offenses against Isaiah Meyer-Crothers.

Advertisem*nt

How the situation reaches a resolution from here is unknown. There is no precedent. But here are four avenues the Bruins could explore:

1. Do nothing

The Bruins would continue to pay Miller his annual AHL salary and his signing bonus ($95,000 per year) until the contract expires after the 2024-25 season. They would decline to issue him a qualifying offer after that, which would make him an unrestricted free agent. He would make a total of $532,500 over the course of the deal — three years of $82,500 salary plus three years of the $95,000 signing bonus.

Whether Miller wants this is unknown. It would make him ineligible to play for any other professional club while his contract with the Bruins remains active.

Miller could still attempt a career resurrection in Europe if he is able to sign there. After seeing how the signing blew up in the Bruins’ faces, it’s unlikely any of Miller’s former NHL suitors would risk a similar reaction.

2. Buy out Miller at the end of 2022-23

Miller would collect the rest of his pro-rated $82,500. The Bruins would then buy out the remaining two years of his deal at his NHL salary. Because Miller, 20, is younger than 26, the buyout would be one-third the cost of the total deal.

The problem with a buyout is how the Bruins would have to apply the cost toward their annual cap hit. According to CapFriendly, the penalty would be $215,834 in 2023-24 and 2024-25. It would decrease to $129,167 in 2025-26 and 2026-27.

These may seem like minimal amounts, but every penny counts — especially when the Bruins could be subject to overage penalties in 2023-24.

For example, Patrice Bergeron earned a $2.5 million performance bonus for appearing in 10 games. David Krejci earned $1 million for reaching the same threshold. Krejci will be due $500,000 if he appears in 20 games and another $500,000 if the Bruins make the playoffs, per CapFriendly.

If the Bruins exceed the $82.5 million ceiling in 2022-23, they may have to roll over some or all of the centers’ bonus payments next year.

3. Negotiate a settlement

General manager Don Sweeney and Eustace King, Miller’s agent, would have to agree on a mutual termination of the contract. A lump sum payment to Miller, negotiated and agreed to by both sides, would be the most likely outcome.

The Bruins would be free of future obligations. Miller would be eligible to play for any other club.

4. Terminate the contract

The Bruins could cite breach of contract in resolving the deal. During his press conference on Nov. 7, team president Cam Neely declined to answer when asked if King had misled the Bruins.

The Bruins would place Miller on waivers for the purpose of terminating the contract. However, the NHLPA would then have 60 days to file a grievance. The union would be likely to do so.

In the press release explaining the decision to part ways with Miller, Neely said it was because of “new information” following the signing. When asked about the nature of the new information, Neely acknowledged it was because the Bruins had not contacted the family of Meyer-Crothers during their due diligence.

(Top photo of Don Sweeney and Cam Neely: John Tlumacki / The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

As an expert in sports contracts and NHL player management, I can confidently analyze the intricate details and potential resolutions surrounding Mitchell Miller's situation with the Boston Bruins. My expertise stems from an in-depth understanding of the NHL's Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), player contracts, and the dynamics of team management.

The article highlights a complex scenario involving Mitchell Miller, who is still under an active three-year entry-level contract with the Bruins despite the team's decision to part ways with him on November 6. The primary reason for the separation was cited as a lack of due diligence, stemming from Miller's history of offenses against Isaiah Meyer-Crothers.

Let's break down the key concepts discussed in the article:

  1. Active Contract Status: Mitchell Miller's three-year entry-level contract is still active, and he is receiving an annual AHL salary of $82,500. The Bruins, despite severing ties, are obligated to honor the contract until its expiration in the 2024-25 season.

  2. Potential Resolutions: a. Do Nothing: The Bruins could choose to do nothing and continue paying Miller until the contract expires. After that, they could decline to issue a qualifying offer, making him an unrestricted free agent. b. Buyout Option: The Bruins could consider buying out Miller at the end of the 2022-23 season, paying the remaining pro-rated salary and applying a one-third buyout cost against their annual cap hit. c. Negotiate a Settlement: General manager Don Sweeney and Miller's agent, Eustace King, could negotiate a mutual termination of the contract, potentially involving a lump sum payment to Miller. d. Terminate the Contract: The Bruins could cite breach of contract, place Miller on waivers, and attempt to terminate the deal. However, this may lead to a grievance from the NHLPA.

  3. Financial Implications: The article delves into the financial implications of potential buyouts, including the impact on the Bruins' annual cap hit. It emphasizes the significance of every penny, especially considering the potential for overage penalties.

  4. Legal and Procedural Considerations: The article discusses the legal aspects of terminating a contract and the potential involvement of the NHLPA, highlighting the lack of precedent in this specific situation.

In summary, the article presents a multifaceted dilemma for the Boston Bruins, involving contractual obligations, financial considerations, and potential legal challenges. The team must carefully navigate these complexities to reach a resolution that aligns with both contractual obligations and public perception.

What's next for Bruins, Mitchell Miller? Why he's still on the payroll, and 4 potential paths forward (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Mrs. Angelic Larkin

Last Updated:

Views: 6142

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (67 voted)

Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Mrs. Angelic Larkin

Birthday: 1992-06-28

Address: Apt. 413 8275 Mueller Overpass, South Magnolia, IA 99527-6023

Phone: +6824704719725

Job: District Real-Estate Facilitator

Hobby: Letterboxing, Vacation, Poi, Homebrewing, Mountain biking, Slacklining, Cabaret

Introduction: My name is Mrs. Angelic Larkin, I am a cute, charming, funny, determined, inexpensive, joyous, cheerful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.